Cybersquatting


“Cybersquatting” Involves Inserting Another’s Trademark into a Domain Name

Kronenberger Rosenfeld handles all forms of domain name disputes, including cybersquatting, “typo-squatting” and other domain-based trademark infringement. Our anti-cybersquatting lawyers also handle domain name theft (aka domain hijacking) and domain transfer fraud matters. Kronenberger Rosenfeld is a leader in domain name litigation, creating new Ninth Circuit law concerning the ability to seize domain names as property.

Litigating and arbitrating domain name disputes has been at the core of our practice for over 10 years.

There are two primary options if a third party has registered a domain name with your trademark, business name, or personal name.

ICANN'S UNIFORM DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (UDRP)

The first option is to file a complaint with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) under its arbitration procedures and request that the domain be transferred to you. When a domain is registered, the individual or business registering the domain submits to mandatory arbitration in the event of a future dispute. ICANN arbitrations are substantially cheaper than federal litigation. Another advantage of ICANN arbitrations is that results can be obtained more quickly than in litigation (sometimes in 60 days). Kronenberger Rosenfeld handles many ICANN arbitration cases on a flat fee basis. Click here for more on our experience with ICANN arbitrations, or you can submit your matter to us now using our online case submission form.

ANTICYBERSQUATTING CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (ACPA)

The federal ACPA is a second option for trademark owners. Under the ACPA, trademark owners can seek not only transfer of the disputed domain but also monetary damages. Our firm has experience in federal court with this fairly new statute. If you would like more information, please submit your matter using Kronenberger Rosenfeld's online case submission form.

NO FEDERAL TRADEMARK, BUT STILL A VICTIM?

If you feel that someone has registered a domain (containing, say, your business or product name) and is competing against you unfairly, you may be able to assert your “common law trademark rights,” even though you have not registered a trademark with the federal government. Common law trademarks have been the basis for both ICANN arbitration complaints and complaints under the federal ACPA. If you would like to know whether you can assert common law trademark rights in your domain dispute, please submit your matter using our online case submission form.

For additional details on domain law matters, please call us at 415-955-1155, ext. 120, or submit your matter online.


REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Read More
  • Represented a major MMO game company in a dispute involving a domain name containing an exact version of its primary trademark, resulting in the client eventually obtaining the domain name.
  • Represented online marketplace of high-end furniture and artwork in a dispute over a domain name that a third party owned containing our client’s primary trademark.
  • Defended website developer against claims of copyright infringement and brought counterclaims against the plaintiff for cybersquatting. Prevailed on all claims and counterclaims on behalf of the defendant-client during a five day jury trial, and received an award of statutory damages under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act along with attorneys’ fees.
  • Represented car rental business in cybersquatting claim against competitor that had registered confusingly similar domain name to divert client’s Internet traffic.
  • Represented true owner of domain name against an anonymous party who had hacked into our client’s domain registry account and stole a valuable domain name. Our firm prevailed on our claim for conversion of the domain name and obtained a court order requiring the registrar to transfer the domain name back to our client. The court’s decision reinforced the jurisprudence that domain names constitute property subject to common law conversion.
  • Defended an Internet advertiser client against a Southern home improvement company in a case concerning state and federal unfair competition claims. Resolved the case early through favorable settlement that required no monetary payment from client.
  • Defended a lead generation company in cybersquatting suit brought by its customer. Defeated the plaintiff’s request for prohibitive and one-sided preliminary injunction. Resolved case through settlement that repaired the parties’ fractured business relationship.






Kronenberger Rosenfeld recognized as a Top Boutique of 2015 by The Daily Journal

Let’s get started

online case submissions

Send us information about your matter, and we will respond to you promptly

Submit Online